Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veredus Laboratories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 00:25Z

Veredus Laboratories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Company notability not established Mandel 14:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think the multiple sources satisfy the new version of WP:CORP. The company is getting independent recognition from Red Herring[1] and theWall Street Reporter[2]. I've added a link to another source in the article. --Mereda 16:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. -- Mereda 16:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep multiple sources. With advanced technology, has a test lab on USS Kitty Hawk.[3] --23:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The references demonstrate notability. --Oakshade 03:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, independent sources have since been cited. Meets WP:CORP criteria. Terence Ong 13:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand, seems reasonably notable. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 16:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.