Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vergilov Rocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Bulgarian Beach as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 16:39, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vergilov Rocks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Vergilov Rocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three rocks off a beach in Antarctica do not have inherent notability. The page has a few maps and a line in a gazeteer of antarctica. JMWt (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Antarctica. JMWt (talk) 15:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I cannot find any geologic or paleontologic significance about them. I searched the standard geoscience databases and Google Sholar. In fact, I cannot find anything at all excpet the maps and gazeteer mentioned above. Paul H. (talk) 00:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to the lack of credible indication of importance. Sources confirm that they exist, but do not seem to claim that there is anything particularly notable about them. ScalarFactor (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep These rocks are part of the configuration of an embayment used for the transfer of people and cargo by Zodiac boats, see Emona Anchorage and St. Kliment Ohridski Base, and thus relevant to the local navigational safety. Best, Apcbg (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: This article is a prime candidate for a merge to Bulgarian Beach ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 15:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the merge idea?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:46, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Merge as an ATD to the more notable land structures its close to. As on its own, lacks SIGCOV.Lorraine Crane (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.