Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veriflora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Veriflora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. This has been tagged for notability for the last six and a half years, and no one has yet established notability. Boleyn (talk) 08:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This appears to be a commercial program based on an ISO standard. The Veriflora web site gives this as the top motivator for their customers: "Build brand value for their products" - nothing wrong with that, but confirms that this is a product, not, for example, a government standards program. Only 6 links come up with a Google search, one of which is this WP article. I'd say that this is a small and insignificant commercial enterprise, and should not have a WP article. delete LaMona (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Failure to meet WP:GNG or any other criteria that I think applies. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.