Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronte Autopilot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:33, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Veronte Autopilot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Veronte Autopilot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, lacks WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. Zuck28 (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Engineering, Aviation, Spaceflight, and Spain. Zuck28 (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This article might be eligible for CSD G5.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment article is not eligible for G5, as CU found the article creator unrelated to the putitive sockmaster (albiet socking/involved in meatpuppetry themselves) and, even if it had been confirmed, the putitive sockmaster was not blocked at the time this article was created and thus it was not created in evasion of a block. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Why was this AFD not closed as a soft delete? From what I seen on the page’s history, there has been no denied PROD, so I don’t see why this was relisted. Protoeus (talk) 00:08, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.