Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versions of Blade Runner
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Mgm|(talk) 21:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Versions of Blade Runner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This Article is wholly about a single piece of work - and does not merit having its own page. PlikPlok (talk) 14:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The reasons given are not proper justification for deletion. The article is informative and encyclopedic, and folding it into the parent article would tend to overwhelm it. This article has existed for over a year, and has contributions from over 60 editors, so the community clearly approves of its existence. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 14:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems like encyclopedic, relevant, sourced content to me. What sort of reason for deletion is "wholly about a single piece of work", anyway? This is a sub-article of Blade Runner, and it seems sensible to leave a summary there and the detail here.--Michig (talk) 14:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above. No sound reasoning is offered for deletion. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think it makes sense to have a page on this topic and to have it separate from the main article. Rnb (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup — some unverifiable trivia/OR, but not really anything deletable in my view. MuZemike (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's sourced and this is a good example of correctly breaking detailed information out of the parent article and keeping the main article a summary of main points. LinguistAtLarge 20:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.