Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verso Recto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Verso Recto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Couldn't find any significant coverage for the game. Only notable thing seems to be that award it supposedly won (reference is dead, archived version doesn't exist). Even if a source was found for the award, the game would still need something else substantial written about it.

Note 1: This game is not to be confused with a 2021 board game called "Recto Verso", which seems to be a completely different game.

Note 2: I suspect the article creator has an undisclosed conflict of interest. Mika1h (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.