Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ViPNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — This non-notable software fails the WP:SOFTWARE criteria and is associated with articles promoting the INFOTECS company. It failed the "prod" process when the creator removed the tag without explanation. Smells like spam to me. JonHarder 02:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Spam-vert, no statement of notability. -- MarcoTolo 02:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Spam advertisement, appear to have one notable google hit on the first page... Jude (talk,contribs,email) 13:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 16:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 17:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. SorryGuy 05:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation - I am sorry for not paying my attention enough to Wikipedia's policies, this is my mistake and that why deleted tag without notice.sorry. I have re-written this article. I hope it is better now. the idea of this article is to share a little about another vpn technology like IPSec or SSL. --AlexeyN 10:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.