- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-prominent company Skysmith 06:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not very notable Michael 07:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable corporation. Privately held, 100 employees, no claims to notability. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-02 08:35Z
- Delete per nom. Ste4k 09:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. SM247My Talk 10:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 17:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP. Wikibout-Talk to me! 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - appears to be vanity, too. - Richardcavell 00:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Stub - Nationally very prominent strategy consultancy in Finland with majority of Talouselama 500 (Finland Top 500) list firms as clients, some presence also in some other countries, article should be rewritten though
- Delete per above. Zos 23:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: stub is not a vote, either say keep, delete, merge/redirect. Zos 23:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.