Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Quinteros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All of the users who have added their below Vasquito other than Tom harrison are clearly sockpuppets. Sr13 (T|C) 05:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Quinteros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Created by a single-purpose account Vasquito, probably the subject. My {{db-nn}} was removed by another single-purpose account, Nacperu. I still don't see an assertion of notability, or any verified information. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Obvious vanity page. Subject is not notable. The Parsnip! 14:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - 65 g-hits, non on them reliable sources. Ryan Postlethwaite 14:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Vanity, n.n., reads like a D- level promotional blurb. DickClarkMises 16:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube 18:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless sources can be added--which is always possible. Suggest blanking the comment a few lines up, as a use of this discussion for purposes of libel. DGG 02:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - An aerobic champion page. Subject is notable in its field . vasquito 08:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  — vasquito (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per DickClarkMises above. Tom Harrison ^Talk 13:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Sources added, why someone is deleting the new sources?. I also think the subject is notable in its field . User eddyvirto 08:52, 5 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.230.90.204 (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

  — eddyvirto (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep - I think we get real info on pages like www.sportarobics-nac.com or www.idea.com not to mention peruvian newspapers,argentinean magazines and associations there in the US 196000 g-hits, some of them reliable sources.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nacperu (talk • contribs) 05:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

• — Nacperu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep - this article is good I value international content and contributions from other cultures like fashion is south america. ajhightower 12:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  — ajhightower (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep - I compete in gymnastics I wish aerobics where still as notable as in the 80's and 90's . I consider this page inspiring and I think the subject is notable in its field. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Humbertor (talk • contribs) 00:15, May 6, 2007 (UTC)

  — Humbertor (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep - more data related to his fashion carrer is needed. I consider this page needs more content related but still think the subject is notable in fitness. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cherie2 (talk • contribs) 101:49, May 6, 2007 (UTC)

  — Cherie2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep - I agree that the subject is notable in fitness. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Storey d (talk • contribs) 02:36, May 7, 2007 (UTC)

  — Storey d (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Strongly Keep - I know this photographer, he shot Super Model Naomi Cambell at New York Fashion Week and we had a blast at Vogue Lounge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miabella25 (talk • contribs) 20:50, May 7, 2007 (UTC)

  — Mirabella25 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.