Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria redevelopment tram services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:NOTBURO. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria redevelopment tram services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is nothing more than a timetable for trams. It does not provide much context and does not indicate the notability of the subject. Passengerpigeon (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTTIMETABLE. If any sourced information were in this article, it could possibly be added to Manchester Victoria station#Victoria Metrolink station, subject to WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:RECENTISM etc. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. Mr Stephen (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (converse) @ 20:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note Article's creator has also created Victoria redevelopment. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a travel guide, nobody in their right mind would look for this information on Wikipedia, and the article is so sloppy it doesn't even say where Victoria is.TheLongTone (talk) 22:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above & NOTDIR. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.