Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Videodamus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jamie^☆S93 01:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Videodamus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism, this is the first use of this term on the internet. Wronkiew (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nonsensical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lots42 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 14 May 2009

• Delete Neologism and as pointed out practically nonsensical babble. Drawn Some (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm inclined to say WP:CSD G1. There is no meaningful content. It is patent nonsense, section 2. Dlohcierekim 02:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.