Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vienna (feed reader)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vienna (feed reader) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All that I can find for significant coverage is this. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it is odd that the article has been around since 2005, with a notability template on it for a long time, and nobody was able to produce a secondary source. Racepacket (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.