Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vimond Media Solutions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was closing as moot, article has been speedily deleted by Jezebel'sPonyo, as noted below. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vimond Media Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Google News finds one article in Norwegian. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.
- Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising that undermines any possible claim for minimal importance: Although Vimond Media Solutions is a new company launched in Q1 2011, the technology embodied in the Vimond Video Platform has been developed and proven in production over more than ten years at TV 2 in Norway and at other Scandinavian broadcasters. Now available for the first time to other broadcasters, telcos and media organizations, the Vimond Video Platform provides an intuitive and mature environment for production staff to manage the distribution of online video content, a powerful set of tools for managers to create commercially successful services, and a stable, high-quality experience for viewers. So tagging. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note I've deleted the article under WP:CSD#G11 criteria, as Ihcoyc notes above, it was blatant promotion. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.