Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo da Via Anfossi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vincenzo da Via Anfossi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page doesn't appear to be encyclopedic. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- In what respect? Give people something to hang their hats on. Uncle G (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak keep - there are some sources online: Discogs, AllMusic, Viberate, Google News, etc. Instagram is not a reliable source, but he has 47,400 followers. I'm not sure that it's significant coverage, but I'm equally unsure that a decent search was done before nominating it. Bearian (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete the sources are not good for BLP and WP ARTIST. Unicorbia (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. The best sources I could find in a quick google search were listings of his music, capsule reviews, or mere mentions. Nothing substantial enough to support a BLP. Maybe if someone familiar with Italian hip-hop were to take a deep dive they could find something, but that needs to be done before creating an article on a living person. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: No independent coverage in RS. 190.219.103.171 (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.