Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence in Decadence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Violence in Decadence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an essay and the topic does not appear to be itself notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NOTESSAY and WP:N. 🟥⭐ talk to me! 04:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I don't really see any point in draftifying this when it seems so unlikely that this will ever be notable or encyclopedic. If the creators request that it be draftified and commit to working on it further then sure I guess. But given that they wrote this for a WikiEd course that's now finished I somehow doubt that anyone is going to continue working on this. Draftifying it would just mean deletion via G13 in 6 months anyway. MCE89 (talk) 14:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as per above discussion. It's as pure as an essay written here as I've ever seen. Bearian (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR. Archrogue (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.