Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viral Lode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Presumably Kjkold doesn't object to deletion either. I'm not going to make the redirect myself, though, as I don't think it's useful. -Splash^talk 17:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

band created early this year, nn. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 06:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to viral load, perhaps? -- Kjkolb 08:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless a redirect is considered sensible, but I'd have thought in general people would spell 'load' sooner than 'lode'. Mallocks 13:10, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.