Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 11:38, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Virgio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Virgio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. Furthermore, the WP:BEFORE check has failed. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Karnataka. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The subject clearly passes WP:ORGCRIT. There is in-depth coverage about the subject in reliable sources such as Economic Times1, Economic Times2 Entrepreneur, TechCrunch, Inc42, and TV9 several others. So I believe this should sufficiently meet the requirements for WP:NCORP as well. All the best! Baqi:) (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The company has been widely covered by reliable and independent sources. As per sources provided by Baqi, offer significant coverage beyond trivial mentions. A quick Google search also shows a strong media presence. Monhiroe (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The subject is notable for a Wikipedia article under WP:GNG and WP:ORG. It has received significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources, also the significance of the award cannot be refuted.Zuck28 (talk) 09:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.