Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Pool (video game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 00:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Virtual Pool (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD. Has insufficient visible verifiable references from reliable sources. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see if I can dig up some contemporary reviews or other newssources. 2fort5r (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Here is a newspaper review from August 1995, however I don't have access to the full text. 2fort5r (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep First in a notable series of games, published by a major company (Interplay). I have added several references from magazines at the time (1995). --Canley (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – There appears to be a fair amount of coverage in the Google News archives[1][2] in addition to those sources which have already been added to the article. --Dominic Hardstaff (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Published by a major publisher, and sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:N. --Teancum (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, though merging three near-stubs and two nonexistent games in the series to Virtual Pool would probably be preferential. Nifboy (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.