Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual high five

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 01:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual high five (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism/Stuff made up one day? Again, I am neutral, and listing for discussion. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 22:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Neologism, No source, Not enough significance for a article on WP. Perhaps for the Urban Dictionary. -- Emana (Talk) 23:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Amazingly, there is already an article for High five that includes a section on the "air five". Since, by this article's own admission, "Virtual high five" is synonymous with "Air five", it seems that any relevant new information (including a cite on the term, if it can be found) should be copied into High five, at which point this article is superfluous. --BlueSquadronRaven 05:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A quick subsequent search of the web and the news through Google did not reveal any use of the term "virtual high five" in the same context as "air five". A "virtual high five" seems only to refer to the "giving" of a high five over the internet. Given this, and barring any subsequent sources found, I think Virtual high five should simply be deleted as both non-notable and inaccurate. --BlueSquadronRaven 05:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I can't think of any good reason this shouldn't be a redirect to High five — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Beyond pointless. No reason to redirect because we don't need a bunch of redirects with words added to the term redirected to. E-high five, computer high five, Internet high five, digital high five, net high five -- ridiculous. Anyone looking for it will look for plain old high five. DreamGuy (talk) 13:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Clean-up. Cites no sources, not clearly noteworthy. Cnilep (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.