- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet requirements of WP:CORP. Reads like an {{advert}}. Agent 86 02:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Coredesat 02:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Phileas 02:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --TrianaC 02:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Agreed that it smells like an ad/vanity. However, I've found a couple of articles, not sure if these are enough to address WP:CORP? Microsoft India case study, ExpressComputer - Indian IT business weekly article, another from same magazine in 2003, CXO today article, 2005. No "vote" from me, just offering this up for consideration. Paddles TC 09:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom as advert Optimale Gu 13:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam, looks copied and pasted off their website.--Andeh 13:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertisement/spam. Tachyon01 20:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spamadvertisement. —Khoikhoi 03:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.