- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 20:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Virus Nine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. ninety:one 20:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Joe Chill (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Changed to Keep per new sources. Joe Chill (talk) 02:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Routine nn-band. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, I found few sources, see [1], [2], [3], and [4].--Cannibaloki 16:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A self-published MySpace blog doesn't count, so that's a grand total of three reviews. ninety:one 16:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. WP:MUSIC says a band is notable if it "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable." I've added the three non-blog reviews above, and a newspaper article easily found in a gnews search (and cleaned up the article). While I'd like to see the two exclaim.ca pieces be a bit longer, this adds up to multiple works for me.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep passes WP:BAND #5. Could use improvement however. TheWeakWilled 01:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, non-notable. Fair Deal (talk) 23:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.