Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viruscrackers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete article text itself claims copyright - thus incompatible with GFDL, plus it's bordering on linkspam anyway. -Doc ^ask? 14:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article is advertising and rather incoherent. Iaen 10:22, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and it claims to be copyrighted too. Can this be speedied? Anville 10:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not very familiar with deletion policy. I think it's (just barely) outside that scope. It's not "unsalvageably incoherent (e.g., random characters)", and "Incompetent and/or immature material" is not "patent nonsense". Iaen 10:51, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.