Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visa Bulletin Employment-based Preferences Cut-off Dates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleted. This type of information is available from the federal government and since Wikipedia is not a reliable source, I hope people do look elsewhere for a resource like this. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Visa Bulletin Employment-based Preferences Cut-off Dates

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Visa Bulletin Employment-based Preferences Cut-off Dates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Visa Bulletin clearly meets our notability guidelines, there is nothing particularly notable about a page that basically duplicates the contents on the Visa bulletins. There are a number of SPA and SP IP accounts who keep editing this page, mostly with no citations for the changes. Guy Macon (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This is not encyclopaedic content. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 21:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Good archive of information on one page. Saves the trouble of searching through multiple past issues of bulletin. Decent usage and readership. PenulisHantu (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the publication branch of the US government. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. We don't need to republish and interpret government publications. Hog Farm (talk) 18:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.