Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishaal Nityanand
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Vishaal Nityanand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor / filmmaker. A "lead role" in a film that has been in production since 2006, but not yet released, and producer/director credits for several films of little notability. Award for "best story" from a film festival of little note. Other awards cannot be verified. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the article says, subject is a documentary filmmaker and got few awards too! But, no clue in world wide web! --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 23:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article says the subject has won some awards but only one of these can be verified (I tried to find sources for the others but couldn't find anything). Before the awards could be considered against WP:N, they would still need to be WP:V. I think we would need at least a couple more "significant coverage" sources for the subject to meet WP:GNG. Stalwart111 23:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.