Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VisionHelpdesk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 21:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VisionHelpdesk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not establish the notability of the product it describes. Of the two sources, one is affiliated. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. The one source in the article from Ping Zine! appears to be reliable (it's printed and distributed and appears to be editorially independent), but not finding other significant coverage in reliable sources. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.