- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vision forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- reconsider the author has taken in the criticism and made changes accordingly. please reconsider deletion.prallman Talk
This article, which was just speedily deleted as a copyvio, has been recreated with slightly different wording. Even if the copyvio issue has been resolved, however, this seems like self-promotional advertising, doesn't it? Biruitorul Talk 03:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Feels awfully self-promotional. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy G11 as spam. RayAYang (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as G11, obvious spam/self promotion RedThunder 11:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.