Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vision house software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty? 12:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company. 27 google hits, no claim close to passing WP:CORP. Three non-notable articles in prod process. Prod deleted by article creator without comment. Weregerbil 15:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--blue520 15:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Just zis Guy you know? 16:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising. -- RHaworth 18:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Admrb♉ltz (T | C | k) 07:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete pure advertising, as a note the authour is also removing the afd tag from the page.Benon 13:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- the author is trying to work out why wikipedia allows large corporations to advertise on wikipedia but not small businesses.....it smells quite bad. you are going off google hits to rate whether a company is worthy? how sad in a forward thinking world.
- the author is also getting lost in the ridiculous amounts of links you place in your messages....one wonders where they are supposed to click to get the right informationFluidcreativity
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.