Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vision of Isaiah
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete and redirect. Mailer Diablo 16:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This used to be a redirect to the apocryphal Ascension of Isaiah, one section of which is known as the Vision of Isaiah, until User:TheEditrix replaced it with a new article on a verse found in 2 Chronicles.
The article asserts that there was a book called "Vision of Isaiah". This is problematic on three counts
- it does not give sources for the assertion that that book did exist and is different from the historical sections in the Book of Isaiah that are concerned with King Hezekiah.
- it does not give sources that people call that hypothetical book the "Vision of Isaiah"
- it does not give a source for the assertion that "some" (who?) consider the 2nd century AD Ascension identical with the work mentioned in the 5th century BC Books of Chronicles
Delete as original research and replace the original redirect to the Ascension of Isaiah. Dr Zak 22:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & Restore Redirect per Dr Zak. If there's a place for this topic so it doesn't become a POV fork, it's in the Ascension of Isaiah article. --DaveG12345 01:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect per nom. Tevildo 12:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Redirect The sources I looked at all agree that it refers to ch. 6-11 of the Ascension of Isaiah. This almost looks like a case of WP:NFT. JChap 20:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete and redirect per above. Stifle (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.