Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visionaire (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Visionaire (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not assess its notability. External links consist of games made with the software, none notable enough to have their own article either. Also written like an ad. NOTE: Article has been deleted before for G11 (Blatant advertising). Admrboltz (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 01:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 06:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, whilst style issues such as reading as an advert are not grounds for deletion, the available sources seem rather weak and thus this article seems unable to establish notability. --Taelus (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no reliable sources writing about this software. -- Whpq (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom and above. ZooFari 01:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - little sources; written like an advert (but not quite G11)--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 02:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.