- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shame, looks like an interesting program :( Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Vistapack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 22:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable source refs (refs provided are forum post and download site), no indication of notability; created by an SPA as possible promotional article. Dialectric (talk) 16:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: found nothing useful. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.