- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete G7 author request. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 13:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- VisualBB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Software with no assertion of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.I'm the developer of the software and I would like the page to remain up. I know I don't have a user base yet, but I'm working on that and I believe having a page on Wikipedia will help that. Psybadek
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Appears to not yet be notable. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 21:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't find any reliable sources about it. JulesH (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if the software was notable, someone other than the author would have written the WP article. -Atmoz (talk) 16:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, and after the dev said that this had no user base and that this was, in effect, spamming, Strong Delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empire3131 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.