- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Phroziac(talk) 01:35, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable. --Jasonuhl 19:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All the relevant google hits I found were to copies of one opinion-piece-style article, where this codename was used in passing. Bunchofgrapes 21:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting for 5 more days to get more input. -Splashtalk 01:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark)|My RfA 01:54, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. -- Kjkolb 02:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unverifiable. Cnwb 03:14, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. non-notable, unverifiable. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unverifiable. Could be an article about conspiracy theories related to the codename, but there don't seem to be any. --Aquillion 04:18, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN --Rogerd 08:42, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.