Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivaksh Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vivaksh Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page previously deleted via A7 and a second time via G11 and is an unremarkable person whose name does not appear in any of the given references. I was unable to find any reference to his novel "Because Every Breath Is an Illusion" Attention by someone who speaks Hindi will be useful in examining this article due to some of the source material being in that language. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tagged it earlier under promotion (because the article does assert significance, it just sounds like someone not very notable's CV) and it got deleted and then recreated shortly afterwards, so fairly sure this should just be speedied again and possibly WP:SALTed. If this guy could possibly be notable, it would still be WP:TOOSOON. LS1979 (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. It is an instance of self-promotion and the references provided has nothing about the article leave alone anything significant/notable. The references provided in Hindi language are about a simple school function. Hence article is not notable and hence should be deleted. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete As per nomination. We should not allow the misuse of Wikipeda as a self promotion platform. Athachil (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete --As per nom..The Herald 13:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.