Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voitka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ülo Voitka, always preferable to deletion--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voitka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DAB page that has one person with this last name (the other page was deleted) Wgolf (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 20:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My lvoitka is to either rename Ülo Voitka Ülo and Ailar Voitka and redirect there, since their notability (or lack thereof) is apparently intertwined,[1] or delete both Ülo Voitka and this dab(less) page. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is not a disambiguation page, but an anthroponomy page, see MOS:DABNAME. However, it contains no information on the meaning or derivation of the name, and only lists one entry for which notability is demonstrated. – Fayenatic London 08:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ülo Voitka. I have my doubts whether that article is worth keeping but that's a separate matter. --Michig (talk) 07:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.