Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volinski's triangle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Volinski's triangle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search did not turn up any reference to this term in medical literature, or anywhere else for that matter. Possibly a mistake, or a truly unknown WP:NEOLOGISM. This author's edit summary on removing my PROD seems indicates that this article is important because "there is no info. about this" anywhere else. Glenfarclas (talk) 13:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 14:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (sadly)?--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 21:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This eponym does not appear in the medical literature and is therefore not notable. Novangelis (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete At the risk of sounding cruel, isn't the author's comment compelling?--SPhilbrickT 00:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.