- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- VoltDB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolutely no indication of the topic's importance. Possibly some google hits but hard to find third-party, non-trivial coverage; also, no third-party non-trivial coverage included in the article. This article, based on its "3 days ago" release and the three links (twitter, blog, official website) smells an awful lot like WP:ADVERT. It may be notable, but there are no links here to prove it. — Timneu22 · talk 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 16:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Barely even says what the subject is, let alone why it is notable. Bonewah (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7]. Joe Chill (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, fair enough... can someone add the relevant ones to the article? (Like, not the German one(s)?) — Timneu22 · talk 19:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Pardon my weak wiki foo. I added a little more content. — adweisbe · talk 20250829063900
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per Joe Chill's refs. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, because it's becaming very popular now among NoSQL movement. --93.191.72.229 (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment popularity does not equate to notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 10:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.