Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume overdose records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Volume overdose records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete nothing indicating notability of this company per WP:CORP and it's only been around for a year; and given the viral nature of our WP:BAND criteria, if this is notable, all artists who have 2 releases through them are suddenly notable too! Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't think that just being a record label makes this company notable. I looked for sources and couldn't find anything. Not a single mention anywhere. As far as I can tell, there are no artists, bands, or albums affiliated with this company. --Cyrus Andiron 17:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 00:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article doesn't claim notability and I can't find it on google. Wikidemo (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.