Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vomitron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vomitron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extensively informed PROD removed with the sheer basis sourced are listed, but these in fact are the person's own websites, certainly not convincing and therefore I still confirm what my PROD said, it's obvious this article has been used for advertising by the band person and there has never been anything suggesting otherwise at all. SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable independent coverage beyond one mention by Kotaku. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 11:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I searched alternate ways and literally found the same one web page. We are not a free web host for bands. This is one of thousands of bands that have recorded CDs. I found zero evidence this band passes any part of WP:MUSICBIO. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn. - üser:Altenmann >t 08:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.