- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Voniesh Soukhee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable model, does not pass WP:NMODEL Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete WP:TOOSOON after removing all the user generated and self generated promotional sites, there is nothing left but an IMDB entry that with its atrocious grammar appears to be simply user generated as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete I was unable to find additional, reliable, secondary sources which would have established this model's notability under any of WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:NMODEL. --j⚛e deckertalk 04:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.