Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo Magick Box
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 13:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This a) doesn't seem notable, or b) might be a hoax. Either way, don't see why we should have an article about it. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I get google hits of people selling these but seems like pseudo-science at best. --Pboyd04 02:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it's definitely real (although who knows if it works) and there's no rule against pseudo-science on Wikipedia as long as it's presented as such. Snurks T C 03:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- To clarify: "Voodoo Magick Box" is a specific product name and the article should probably be moved to a generic title (although I have no clue what that might be) but there's no reason to delete the article, as this seems to be a real and somewhat popular pseudoscientific product. Snurks T C 20:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is a rule against advertising. Durova 03:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn and maybe a hoax. -->Newyorktimescrossword 04:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete questionable and reportedly defunct product of no demonstrated importance Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not sure whether this is a hoax or a pseudoscientific device. The article cannot stay as it is now, for sure. If it worked, someone would already be making billions out of it. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 20:55, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please check Cranial electrotherapy stimulation. The article seems very well written, but it has no references. If this "therapy" is as described, then that's the non-advertising article we need. I'd close this one right now, but I'd like others to check what I've just said. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the minimal additional content (i.e. the device's frequency) to Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and then Redirect to that page, per Pablo. -Colin Kimbrell 20:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.