Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vossenveld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 03:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vossenveld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable student flat in Nijmegen. Not a dormitory, since virtually no university in the Netherlands (apart from Enschede and Utrecht, IIRC) provides housing to the students. Aecis^Brievenbus 21:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Apartment complexes are not notable unless they are heritage listed. Mr Senseless (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Decoratrix (talk) 04:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The dormitory itself is not owned by the university, but rented to provide housing (see the article text). Therefore it does comply with the "rules"... Erik1980 (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • With which rules? Our notability guidelines? We don't have any specific guidelines on dormitories and the like. The only guideline that applies is the general notability guideline. Aecis^Brievenbus 11:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per above, but it should have at least some sources. Tag it. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Is there precedent on this issue? --Sharkface217 22:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Aecis^Brievenbus 12:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.