- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possible Neologism. Google search only turns up the "Democratic Empowerment" page, which the article admits it is a part of. No independent source to confirm this topic's notability. —Ocatecir Talk 17:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A google search yields no indication of independent sources for this political concept, not to mention reliable ones. Darkspots 17:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable neologism. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 18:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research, hoax, and/or something thought up in school one afternoon. semper fictilis 19:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Per Semper Fictilis. --Random Say it here! 23:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. Lankiveil 02:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete, because this edit summary: Cited my website to differentiate it from the rest of the content, and give it credibility suggests that this is a neologism with no reliable sources. Mallanox 23:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. Elrith 00:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.