- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vovida Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete not WP:NOTABLE] LES 953 (talk) 02:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added two references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Two references, one in passing and one (of 83 words) saying the company has been bought out. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. References merely prove existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.