Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyomika Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to 2025 India–Pakistan conflict. ✗plicit 23:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vyomika Singh

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

just appearing in a media briefing is not enough to merit a wikipedia article — Awsib (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Awsib (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too PROMO, simply speaking with the media isn't enough for notability... Most articles used for sourcing are either interviews or talking about the press conference. Appears to have had a routine military career otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Page does not fly. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: This is the most hot topic right now. You can find dozens of many significant noteble coverage about Vyomika Singh on Google. Easily meet WP:GNG. atcar 10:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Very important person related to one of the most discussed current affairs. Aniruddh 07:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is too early to have an article on this subject. Orientls (talk) 11:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Wikipedia's aim is to benefit the readers by providing information of the trending subject. CharlieChoudhary (talk) 13:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, no it's not. Bearian (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability beyond appearance at a press conference. The people voting "keep" above claim that Wikipedia is for "trending subjects" "current affairs" or "hot topic" issues, which is clearly incorrect. Little Professor (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with 2025 India–Pakistan conflict: Subject is BLP1E at this point and the coverage is routine. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable enough for appearing in the screen for one event, didn't participate directly. If the person was a one star general or above, it could have been kept.

𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There Is a lot of media coverage which makes it notable, even though it is all on one day. Dualpendel (talk) 20:42, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge with 2025 India–Pakistan conflict: Not enough coverage before this 2025 conflict to warrant a new page. But she, and Colonel Sofia Qureshi were seen as a subtle message from the Indian Govt with regards to religious unity, which is a notable point to be kept under the main conflict page. Valan0912 (talk) 00:26, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- While notable given the current context, does not warrant an article pending further developments or contributions. The quality of the article as is is also lacking and subject to misinformation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.192.184 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS - "hot topic" is another way of saying he's in today's news cycle. Bearian (talk) 01:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As is "even though it is all on one day." Bearian (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge with 2025 India–Pakistan conflict The information in this article doesn't warrant to be an independent Wikipedia article (as per WP:NOTNEWS). Just because someone has appeared on the news, doesn't mean that they qualify to have an article. Wikipedia will lose its credibility in such case. Also, the article uses too many uncited sources, which makes it unreliable and prone to misinformation. 07:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete – Wikipedia is not the news. Yue🌙 03:38, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to note to the closer there has been off-site canvassing [1]. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with 2025 India–Pakistan conflict I think this makes the most sense given the arguments made previously. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:1E. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Supports the comment by Bearian. Taabii (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Just a piece of news. Does not deserve individual article. Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Kierzek (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.