- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tattoo artist whose claim to fame appears to be being female and independent. No sources other than own site. Deizio talk 20:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: the article has independent sources, but the <references /> tag was accidentally removed. I've added the tag back. --Muchness 22:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral, leaning towards keep. A minor figure, but the multiple non-trivial mentions in notable publications (e.g., Bodies of Subversion, Modern Primitives) arguably make a case for her as part of the historical record in her field. --Muchness 01:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Vyvyn is notable in her field, and merits inclusion. She's been the subject of several non-trivial mentions, especially the RE/SEARCH books mentioned above. Both of the RE/SEARCH texts are major texts in the fields of women's studies and body modifications. The article is well cited and put together, as well. Glowimperial 14:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep third party coverage satisfies WP:BIO. Eluchil404 09:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.