- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WIDWAW (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neologism. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 00:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -we have wiktionary for that. Cheers, Λuα (Operibus anteire) 01:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No, we don't. Wiktionary isn't for unattestable neologisms any more than Wikipedia is for nonnotable ones. Wiktionary is not Wikipedia's trashcan. Angr (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 04:34, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This strikes me as borderline no context speedy deletion, but I guess if I knew what multi-project-management or PM mean, I might not think so. Unfortunately, the article includes nothing to inform me what they are. Cnilep (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PM means Pharmaceutical Marketing, I believe..... Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Management, most likely.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PM means Pharmaceutical Marketing, I believe..... Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --- seems a more or less speediable case of WP:DICDEF, if not indeed of WP:NEO also. Since there are good homes for definitions and Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, it doesn't belong here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.