Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOIL-CD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WOIL-CD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LPTV station doesn´t meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTABILITY. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 16:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 16:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 16:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet GNC and WP:BROADCAST. No reliable independent source. — Mathieudu68 ^talk 21:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BROADCAST and a definite expansion candidate because it isn't just a digital subchannel pipe, but a local television station which originates mostly local content. We're not deleting this. Nate • (chatter) 01:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per long-established precent and WP:BROADCAST. Station is a class A television station, meaning it satisfies more stringent FCC programming requirements than other low-power stations. Mlaffs (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am not finding sources under this name. I think the name is WOIL-LP not WOIL-CD. See [1]. I would trust the FCC.4meter4 (talk) 03:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is the correct call sign, however, per the FCC record. In my experiences, sources can be bad at rendering call signs, so... Raymie (t • c) 02:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.