- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 12:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- WOMM-LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. No sources. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: the article at the moment cites two Burlington Free Press articles, and one of those articles was also in there at the time of nomination as an offline source. Not sure if those can or should be enough (I'm not offering an opinion at this time), but that is not exactly "no sources" either. (For completeness: the Big Heavy World source, since that entity was not independent of the station, is of no relevance here in determining notability.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak keep This is one of the borderline cases, and I wish I had a little more recent coverage. I do not know why they turned in the license as there is no coverage. But coverage for an LPFM feels stronger in Vermont than most places (e.g. WOOL (FM) which was low-power for years). Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.