Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED as mis-spelled dictdef, no expansion potential. — JIP | Talk 18:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(poorly written) Dic def. No content.

• Delete per nom. jnothman ^talk 13:53, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Poorly and inaccurately written. "Wack" is a term of affection in Liverpool. The author of this poor quality dicdef couldn't even spell "Whack". Delete, speedily as {{empty}} if possible. 14:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --JJay 14:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Useless dictionary definition. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 16:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.