- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 01:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fannish and irrelevant. The Tucker Max board did not invent the concept; the term Wahooing is not used at all outside of the Max board and a few splinter boards. No notable sources. Either delete or re-direct to either cyberterrorism, cyber-bullying or cyberstalking. Nota bene: the practice is also highly illegal as outlined in the article. Kerwash 03:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. TheRingess 03:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a proto/neologism, WP:NEO refers. Posts to bulletin boards and Usenet, wikis or messages left on blogs, are never acceptable as primary or secondary sources. (aeropagitica) (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete protologism of net kids. Danny Lilithborne 06:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --AlexDW 17:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Jimjones5 21:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.